No other has sparked so angry a struggle in a community as . The debate concerning whether it prevents cancer is continuing. Naturally, the stakes in this struggle are really high because cancer is the second greatest cause of death in this state after cardiovascular disease. Because of this, all of us want to understand how to protect ourselves from this creature, particularly because conventional western medicine doesn’t offer preventative prescriptions.

Let’s start

Yes, there are a number of screening tools such as mammograms, colonoscopies and PAP smears, but these are far from 100% accurate. Therefore, we have to forge our own fight concerning cancer prevention. Because doesn’t provide a solution, I needed to find one in my. From the beginning it wasn’t a simple task because this isn’t taught in medical schools. Obviously, history has proven that sometimes taking away the tumor itself doesn’t work well enough because although cancer is removed, the main cause of the cancer wasn’t even discovered and not eradicated.

The result: cancer recurrence. According to a research, surgery might even foster the spread of cancer. During recovery from surgery our body makes growth stimulators to promote recovery; sadly, these stimulators really help cancer to spread. Therefore, elimination of a tumor isn’t necessarily the best single solution. This struck me on a personal level because my father died of prostate cancer. I desperately needed to learn if there was any holistic preventative protection against contracting cancer. I began searching for the answer. In 2008, the first breakthrough came.

Research

A study was published in European Journal of Cancer in June of the year that examined people with melanoma that were advised by their physicians to avoid sun exposure. The patients who disobeyed the doctor’s orders and got a great deal of sun exposure were really doing better than those who followed doctor’s orders and remained out of sun! Even more revealing was the fact that nearly all melanoma patients didn’t have a sun signature , making sun the unlikely cause of the deadly skin cancer.

This was puzzling because if we assume that cancer is caused by carcinogens or similar functioning representatives like sun, then someone who has cancer should keep away from those representatives. Obviously, this wasn’t the case. So, if it’s not carcinogens or sun that resulted in the melanoma, what was the cause? How do we explain that girls, who never smoked, still have lung cancer? Could the origin of cancer be inside people? In cases like this, the logical explanation could be our own broken defense against cancer.

Body functions

Normally our body finds, kills, and then eliminates what could damage it. Bacteria or tumor cells are recorded by body cells which attack foreign enemies, namely the macrophage or dendrite cells. They release a exceptional signature called antigen to memory cells (lymphocytes), and then decide whether it is fine to allow these cells be murdered. If the foreign germs are bad, or it’s a cancer cell, then our body mobilizes all of its sources to kill the bad cells. But does this always happen in reality? We know that it doesn’t always occur.

Somehow, our bodies don’t recognize cancer cells as enemies and therefore it enables them to flourish as opposed to kill them. The Kitava study found that individuals don’t have cancer if they’re not subject to the influences of modern culture. Initially, it seemed to me that something was really wrong with the cells that attack the cancer cells, the lymphocytes. What could be wrong with them? Then, what I heard shocked me.

Vitamine D

It is triggered not only in the kidneys but also in the section of the I was interested in – macrophages. Why would our body opt to activate Vitamin D in macrophages? Is it because macrophages need Vitamin D to operate? In accordance with National Institute of Health that there is not any connection between Vitamin D and cancer prevention. Moreover, we don’t require that much vitamin D since the recommended daily dose is only 600 units. Because some products, such as milk, are fortified with Vitamin D, the vast majority of people are getting enough of it every day, in accordance with the National Institute of Health.

Suddenly, I asked myself: Why would melanoma patients fare better if they had been subjected to ? Would this fact relate somehow to Vitamin D and its effects on the body? In its simplest form: What does sun do? It makes Vitamin D! Therefore, can it be Vitamin D we will need to get more of in order to be protected from cancer? To further investigate I had to prove that low Vitamin D levels were associated with higher cancer rates or generated a terrible prognosis. What I discovered was this: Multiple studies demonstrated a deficiency of Vitamin D leads to increased risk of cancer or decreased survival rates, particularly for colon and breast cancer.